Reaserch article

Enhancing functional properties of sesame meal protein extracts through conjugation with maltodextrin

Da-Rea Kim1,2, Hyun-Su Choi1,2, Shin-Joung Rho3,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5026-750X, Yong-Ro Kim1,2,3,4,*https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1948-3738
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Biosystems Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
2Convergence Major in Global Smart Farm, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
3Center for Food and Bioconvergence, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
4Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
*Corresponding author: Shin-Joung Rho, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea, E-mail: baboshin@snu.ac.kr
*Corresponding author: Yong-Ro Kim, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea, E-mail: yongro@snu.ac.kr

© Copyright 2025 Korean Society for Food Engineering. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Apr 16, 2025; Revised: May 14, 2025; Accepted: May 20, 2025

Published Online: May 31, 2025

Abstract

In this study, conjugates were prepared via dry heat-induced glycosylation with maltodextrin (MD) to enhance the functional properties of sesame meal protein extract (SMPE). With the progress of conjugation, the specific protein bands of SMPE decreased and new bands appeared in the higher molecular weight range (approximately 170 kDa). The FT-IR spectra confirmed the structural modifications resulting from Maillard reaction-driven covalent bonding between SMPE and MD. The solubility and emulsifying properties—emulsifying activity index (EAI) and emulsifying stability index (ESI)—of the conjugates showed little variation with dry-heat treatment time, but they were significantly influenced by the dextrose equivalent (DE) of MD. Solubility was highest when SMPE was conjugated with MD of DE 4–7 at both 12 h (19.38%) and 24 h (20.54%) and decreased as DE increased. Notably, the three-way ANOVA results showed that the emulsifying properties improved significantly with higher DE of MD. The EAI and ESI of SMPE conjugated with MD of DE 16.5–19.5 increased by 1.52- and 1.41-fold, respectively, when compared with the control SMPE. These findings suggest that the SMPE-MD conjugates have promising potential for applications in food systems that require enhanced emulsifying properties.

Keywords: Sesame meal protein extract; Maltodextrin; Maillard reaction; Solubility; Emulsifying property

Introduction

The growing global population has driven a continuous surge in protein demand, prompting the search for sustainable and affordable alternatives to animal-derived proteins. Plant-based proteins have emerged as attractive candidates due to their nutritional benefits, lower production costs, and renewable nature. One promising avenue is the recovery of proteins from agricultural by-products, which can simultaneously reduce environmental waste and create value-added products (Zhou et al., 2023). Sesame, widely recognized for its health-promoting oil rich in linoleic acid, generates a nutrient-dense residue as a by-product of oil extraction. This sesame residue, containing about 28–45% protein, is not only flavorful but also possesses favorable functional properties for food applications (Onsaard, 2012). However, despite its potential, sesame residue is often underutilized, commonly diverted to low-value uses such as animal feed, fuel, or fertilizer, and in some cases, discarded—resulting in resource inefficiency and environmental challenges (Onsaard, 2012; Kim et al., 2023). Unlocking the functional potential of sesame protein isolates from these residues could significantly improve the economic and environmental sustainability of sesame processing, paving the way for their incorporation into diverse food systems.

Proteins in food systems possess both hydrophilic charged regions and hydrophobic domains, enabling them to reduce surface tension and stabilize emulsion interfaces. However, their functional and emulsifying capacities are often constrained by challenges such as poor solubility, structural instability, pH sensitivity, and limited interfacial activity (Qu et al., 2018). One effective strategy to overcome these limitations is protein conjugation with polysaccharides via the Maillard reaction, a non-enzymatic process in which reducing sugars covalently bind to free amino groups of proteins or peptides (Ali et al., 2019; Saatchi et al., 2019). This reaction has been widely recognized for enhancing the functional attributes of proteins, including solubility, thermal stability, and emulsifying performance. Among various protein modification techniques—physical, chemical, and enzymatic—the Maillard reaction offers a particularly advantageous and sustainable route to improve protein functionality (de Oliveira et al., 2016). Recent research has explored the impact of protein–polysaccharide conjugation on the structural and functional properties of various plant-based protein isolates, such as those from canola, oat, rice, and soy (Higa et al., 2023).

Based on this, the present study focuses on the dry heat-induced Maillard conjugation of sesame meal protein extract (SMPE) with maltodextrin (MD) of varying dextrose equivalents (DE). SMPE was obtained from sesame meal, a valuable food processing by-product, through hot water defatting and acid precipitation. This work aimed to elucidate the structural changes and functional enhancements induced by MD conjugation, providing information into the potential application of SMPE-MD conjugates as functional ingredients in the food industry.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Sesame meal pellet, a food by-product, was obtained from Queensbucket Co. Ltd. (Seoul, Korea) and ground using a laboratory grinder. MD with a DE of 8–10 was supplied by Samyang Genex Co. (Seoul, Korea), and MD with DE ranges of 4–7 and 16.5–19.5 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Soybean oil was purchased from a local market (Ottogi Co. Ltd. Pyeongtaek, Korea). All other chemicals used were of analytical grade.

Preparation of SMPE-maltodextrin conjugates

SMPE (protein content 50.74%) was extracted from sesame meal pellets by sequential hot water defatting and precipitation processes (Kim et al., 2023). The SMPE-MD conjugates were prepared via the dry-heating Maillard reaction as described by Kato et al. (1990), and the process is illustrated in Fig. 1. A mixture of SMPE (6 g) and MD (DE 4–7, 8–10, and 16.5–19.5) at a weight ratio of 2:1 (w/w) was dissolved in 500 mL distilled water and subsequently freeze-dried using a lyophilizer (FD8508, Ilshin BioBase Co. Ltd., Dongducheon, Korea). The resulting protein– carbohydrate powder was subjected to dry-heating in a thermohygrostat chamber (PTHC-81R, lab house Co. Ltd., Pocheon, Korea) maintained at 80°C and 79% relative humidity for 12 and 24 h to promote the Maillard reaction. The conjugated samples were rehydrated in distilled water, followed by lyophilization, and subsequently ground into fine powder using a mortar to obtain the final powdered conjugates (SMPE-MD conjugates). SMPE heated under the same conditions without MD was used as a control.

fep-29-2-119-g1
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of preparation of sesame meal protein extract (SMPE)-maltodextrin (MD) conjugates using dry heating treatment.
Download Original Figure
SDS-PAGE analysis

Protein molecular weight distribution was analyzed by SDS-PAGE following the method outlined by Laemmli (1970). Protein samples (0.1 g/mL) were dissolved in distilled water and subjected to heat treatment at 95°C for 10 min to facilitate denaturation. The denatured proteins were then loaded onto the wells of Mini-PROTEAN® TGX™ Precast Gel (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), consisting of 12% separation gel and 4% stacking gel. Protein band separation was performed using a Mini-PROTEAN electrophoresis system at a constant voltage of 160 V. Protein molecular weight distribution was estimated using Prosi Prestained Protein Marker (GenDEPOT, Barker, TX, USA) as a molecular weight standard.

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopic analysis

FT-IR spectra of the samples were obtained using an FT-IR spectrometer (Vertex 80v, Bruker Optics GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) equipped with a deuterated triglycine sulphate (DTGS) detector. Data acquisition was performed using Opus 7.8 software. The samples were ground and mixed with potassium bromide (KBr), then pressed into pellets. Spectra were obtained in the wavenumber range of 600–4,000 cm–1 with 16 scans at a resolution of 4 cm–1.

Solubility

The solubility of SMPE-MD conjugates was determined using the Bradford method (Bradford, 1976). The lyophilized samples were dispersed in distilled water to prepare a concentration of 2 mg/mL and adjusted to pH ranging from 2.0 to 10.0 using 1 N HCl and NaOH. Each solution was stirred for 1 h and subsequently centrifuged at 7,500×g for 15 min using centrifuge (Supra 22K, Hanil Science Industrial Co., Incheon, Korea). A 20 μL aliquot of the supernatant was mixed with 1 mL of Bradford reagent and incubated for 5 min, after which the absorbance was measured at 595 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan). The protein concentration was determined based on a standard curve generated using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the reference protein. The solubility of the SMPE-MD conjugates was calculated using the following Eq. (1):

S o l u b i l i t y ( % ) = P r o t e i n   c o n t e n t   i n   t h e   s u p e r n a t a n t ( mg/mL ) T o t a l   p r o t e i n   c o n t e n t i n   t h e   c o n j u g a t e   b e f o r e   c e n t r i f u g a t i o n ( mg/mL ) × 100
(1)
Emulsifying properties

Emulsifying activity index (EAI) and emulsion stability index (ESI) were evaluated using a turbidimetric method based on the procedure of Klompong et al. (2007) with slight modifications. To prepare the emulsion, 30 mL of SME-MD conjugate solution (1 mg/mL) was mixed with 10 mL of soybean oil, adjusted to pH values ranging from 2 to 10, and homogenized at 20,000 rpm for 1 min using a high-speed homogenizer (T25 digital ULTRA-TURRAX®, IKA, Staufen, Germany). After standing for 10 min, 50 μL of the emulsion was diluted with 5 mL of a 1 mg/mL SDS solution. The absorbance of the diluted emulsion was measured at 500 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. EAI and ESI were calculated by using Eqs. (2) and (3), respectively:

EAI ( m 2 /g ) = 4.606 × A 0 0.25 × p r o t e i n   w e i g h t ( g )
(2)
ESI ( min ) = A 0 × Δ t A 0 A 10
(3)

where A0 and A10 represent the absorbance measured immediately (0 min) after homogenization and after 10 min of storage following homogenization, respectively. Δt denotes the time interval between these two measurements.

Statistical analysis

All measurements were performed in triplicate, and the results are expressed as mean values ± standard deviations (SD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test, was used to assess differences among sample means. Additionally, three-way ANOVA was conducted to evaluate the effects and interactions of the independent variables (MD type, dry-heating time, and pH) on the dependent variables. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), and differences were considered statistically significant at p<0.05.

Results and Discussion

Molecular weight profile of SMPE-MD conjugates

In this study, MD was selected as the glycosyl donor for Maillard-type conjugation with SMPE due to its non-toxic nature, affordability, and broad applications in food and pharmaceutical industries. The Maillard reaction, a widely employed non-enzymatic browning process, enhances protein functionality by covalently linking reducing sugars to free amino groups in proteins or peptides (de Oliveira et al., 2016). This reaction progresses through three distinct phases: the early stage, involving the formation of a reversible Schiff base and subsequent Amadori rearrangement; the intermediate stage, marked by sugar degradation and amino acid breakdown; and the advanced stage, where complex reactions yield nitrogenous heterocycles and melanoidins (de Oliveira et al., 2016). While early-stage Maillard products are generally colorless and exhibit improved techno-functional properties such as emulsification, thermal stability, and foaming, later stages are associated with color development and bioactive compounds with antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Key factors influencing the efficiency and safety of Maillard conjugation include the molecular characteristics of the reactants, the protein-to-carbohydrate molar ratio, availability of reactive functional groups, pH, water activity, temperature, and heating duration, all of which determine the functionality of the final conjugates (Zha et al., 2021; Naik et al., 2022).

When the dried mixture of SMPE and MD was subjected to heat treatment at 80°C, it exhibited a light brown appearance (data not shown), suggesting Maillard reactions or other structural modifications. The SDS-PAGE analysis revealed that SMPE initially displayed characteristic bands (2s albumins, 11s globulins, and 7s globulins) in the molecular weight range of 5–55 kDa, which changed after conjugation with MD (Fig. 2). As the SMPE-MD conjugation reaction progressed, the intensity of the characteristic protein bands of SMPE gradually decreased. The 7S globulin band at approx. 56 kDa gradually faded, and a new band emerged around 170 kDa, suggesting the formation of a high-molecular-weight conjugate. This observation is consistent with previous studies suggesting that it may result from molecular modifications within the protein itself or from its involvement in Maillard reaction with polysaccharides (de Oliveira et al., 20l6; Zha et al., 2021).

fep-29-2-119-g2
Fig. 2. SDS-PAGE changes of SMPE-MD conjugates according to dry-heating time (4, 8, 12, and 24 h). M means marker proteins.
Download Original Figure

Additionally, the disappearance of the 30–35 kDa band suggests the involvement of the 11S globulin acidic subunit in the conjugation. Previous studies have reported that the 11S globulin subunit contains reactive lysine residues that can readily participate in glycation reactions (Hiller & Lorenzen., 2010; Zhang et al., 2014). As heat treatment time increased, the extent of glycosylation intensified, leading to further reduction in free amino groups. This phenomenon occurs due to the reaction (covalent bond) between the free amino groups of proteins and the reducing carbonyl groups of polysaccharides, which progressively decreases the number of reactive amino groups, indicating the progression of the Maillard reaction (Hiller & Lorenzen, 2010; de Oliver et al., 2016).

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

To investigate the structural interactions between proteins and polysaccharides in the conjugated system, the FT-IR spectra of SMPE-MD conjugates were analyzed (Fig. 3). The absorption peaks corresponding to chemical bonds involved in amide group formation were observed in the mid-infrared spectrum, which is closely linked to Maillard reaction products (Van Der Ven et al., 2002). Fig. 3 presents the structural changes of SMPE and SMPE-MD conjugates in the dry powder state. In MD, a characteristic band at 2,900 cm–1 was attributed to C–H stretching. A broad band at 3,318 cm–1 was assigned to hydrogen-bonded hydroxyl groups, indicating the presence of free, intermolecular, and intramolecularly bound hydroxyl groups, which constitute the polysaccharide’s overall structure (Zhang et al., 2018). Additionally, characteristic bands at 924 and 1,149 cm–1 were associated with C–O stretching of the anhydrous glucose ring (C–O–C bond) and C–O stretching of hydroxyl groups (C–O–H), respectively. In the protein spectrum, SMPE was observed to have distinct peaks associated with amide functional groups; amide A (free and bound O–H and N–H stretching) and amide B (C–H stretching) were detected at 3,000–3,500 cm–1 and 2,850–2,980 cm–1, respectively (Ren et al., 2019). The amide I band at 1,700–1,600 cm–1 (C=O stretching) represents secondary structural components, such as α-helices, β-sheets, β-turns, β-antiparallel structures, and random coils (Wang et al., 2014; Mir et al., 2020). Furthermore, amide II (N–H deformation) and amide III (C–N stretching and N–H deformation) bands were found at 1,600–1,500 cm–1 and 1,300–1,200 cm–1, respectively (Demirkiran et al., 2022).

fep-29-2-119-g3
Fig. 3. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of sesame meal protein extract (SMPE), maltodextrin (MD), and SMPE-MD conjugates.
Download Original Figure

Upon conjugation with MD via dry heating, notable changes were observed in the FTIR spectra. A slight redshift of the O–H stretching vibration from 3,318 cm–1 to 3,282 cm–1 was detected in the SMPE-MD conjugates, indicating enhanced hydrogen bonding between the two biopolymers (Nooshkam & Madadlou, 2016; Pirestani et al., 2018). Additionally, an increase in absorption intensity in the amide and carbohydrate-associated regions suggested successful glycosylation. The enhancement of absorption peaks in the C–O stretching (1,149 cm–1) and hydroxyl group (3,318 cm–1) regions was attributed to the increased presence of C–O bonds and hydroxyl groups, a hallmark of protein-polysaccharide covalent conjugates (Pirestani et al., 2018). Furthermore, shifts and decreased intensities in the amide I, II, and III bands to 1,627, 1,540, and 1,242 cm–1, respectively, were observed in the SMPE-MD conjugates. These band shifts and intensity decreases suggest structural modifications associated with Maillard-driven covalent bonding, particularly involving lysine residues (Wang et al., 2013; Saatchi et al., 2019). Given that the Maillard reaction predominantly involves nucleophilic attack by free amino groups (especially lysine ε-amino groups) on reducing sugars, the observed changes indicate a potential loss of free lysine functional groups due to glycation (Huang et al., 2012; Li et al., 2021). Such modifications are consistent with previous studies reporting altered secondary protein structures, reduced free amino groups, and increased molecular weight following glycosylation (Zhang et al., 2014).

Solubility of SMPE-MD conjugates

The solubility changes of SMPE-MD conjugates are shown in Fig. 4. SMPE, which was heat-treated for the same duration (12 and 24 h) as the conjugates without MD, showed a slight increase in solubility when heated with MD. This improvement in solubility is likely attributed to the increased hydrophilicity introduced by the presence of MD. The extent of this enhancement was inversely correlated with the DE of MD, meaning that MD with a higher molecular weight (lower DE values) contributed more significantly to the solubility of SMPE-MD conjugates. Specifically, conjugates formed with MD of DE 4–7 exhibited the most pronounced increase in solubility over both 12 h and 24 h heat treatment durations. These findings suggest that the molecular size of polysaccharides plays a crucial role in stabilizing protein-polysaccharide interactions, with larger MD molecules facilitating stronger conjugation with SMPE and consequently improving solubility (Kutzli et al., 2020). In contrast, glycosylation involving MD with DE 8–10 and DE 16.5–19.5 resulted in higher solubility than heat-treated SMPE alone, but the increase was not statistically significant. This suggests that while covalent bonding between SMPE and MD can enhance the protein’s interaction with water molecules, the effectiveness of glycosylation varies depending on the MD molecular weight. Glycosylation is known to reduce protein aggregation, increase protein-solvent interactions, and decrease protein-protein interactions, all of which contribute to improved solubility (Zhang et al., 2018; Naeini et al., 2024).

fep-29-2-119-g4
Fig. 4. Solubility of SMPE-MD (DE 4–7, 8–10, and 16.5–19.5) conjugates prepared dry-heating at 80°C for 12 and 24 h. All values are expressed as the means of triplicate determinations±standard deviation (SD). Different letters above the bars (a–d) indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.05).
Download Original Figure

The duration of heat treatment also significantly influenced solubility trends. For SMPE-MD DE 4–7 conjugates, solubility was higher when the conjugates were heated for 24 h compared to 12 h. However, for SMPE-MD DE 8–10 and DE 16.5–19.5 conjugates, solubility was higher at 12 h than at 24 h. Extended heating times can enhance glycation, leading to improved solubility up to a certain point. However, excessive heating may result in over-glycation, causing protein cross-linking and aggregation, which ultimately reduces solubility (Mulcahy et al., 2016). Similar observations have been reported for whey protein isolate (WPI) conjugated with gum acacia, where solubility initially improved due to glycation but declined upon excessive Maillard reaction progression beyond 24 h (Chen et al., 2019). These results indicate the importance of optimizing both MD molecular weight and reaction time to enhance the solubility of SMPE-MD conjugates.

Emulsifying properties of SMPE-MD conjugates

The EAI and ESI of SMPE-MD conjugates were evaluated after heat treatment at 80°C for 12 and 24 h. At pH 4, which is near the isoelectric point of SMPE, all samples exhibited low EAI values, likely due to protein aggregation and reduced surface activity (Table 1 and Fig. 5). However, as the pH increased, the EAI values of all samples increased, and SMPE-MD conjugates exhibited significantly higher EAI values than SMPE alone, regardless of dry-heating time (Fig. 5A). This suggests that glycosylation through the Maillard reaction enhances emulsifying activity by suppressing protein aggregation via steric hindrance and improved solubility. These findings align with the study by Lee et al. (2004), which reported that MD contributes to steric stabilization by forming a protective layer around emulsifying droplets, thereby enhancing emulsion formation and stability. Additionally, conjugation with MD expands the secondary protein structure, exposing hydrophilic hydroxyl groups that facilitate adsorption at the oil-water interface, as suggested by Saatchi et al. (2019). Interestingly, the emulsifying activity was also influenced by the molecular size of the conjugates (Fig. 5A). Conjugates with MD of smaller molecular weight (DE 16.5–19.5) exhibited higher EAI values, which was consistent with the findings of Du et al. (2021), who demonstrated that proteins with smaller particle sizes showed greater emulsifying ability and stability due to their enhanced interfacial interactions.

Table 1. Emulsifying properties of SMPE-MD (DE 4-7, 8-10, and 16.5-19.5) conjugates prepared dry heating at 80°C for 12 and 24 h
Sample EAI (m2/g) ESI (min)
pH 2 pH 4 pH 6 pH 8 pH 10 pH 2 pH 4 pH 6 pH 8 pH 10
SMPE 12 h 12.12±3.41bc 5.38±0.22b 21.27±0.64cd 31.57±5.11c 44.14±10.30c 13.40±3.29a 86.67±7.57b 75.87±3.85bc 69.08±11.56b 6.53±1.28e
SMPE 24 h 10.81±0.70c 5.47±0.32b 25.43±2.12bc 33.59±3.49c 59.26±8.05bc 17.36±3.01a 43.50±6.26c 88.57±8.96ab 107.21±14.58a 1.62±1.38f
SMPE-MD DE 4-7 12 h 24.05±2.25a 5.98±0.76b 17.26±2.92d 34.60±6.37c 57.89±10.49bc 2.34±0.11c 27.92±1.92d 11.34±1.43d 17.80±1.48e 15.85±2.68d
SMPE-MD DE 4-7 24 h 23.01±1.48a 11.50±5.47a 27.19±1.47b 39.45±2.23c 51.46±10.33c 3.18±0.10c 10.97±0.39e 63.37±1.66c 29.01±0.20de 7.41±0.41e
SMPE-MD DE 8-10 12 h 23.05±1.51a 8.66±3.26ab 18.12±0.83d 36.64±6.49c 51.18±3.23c 4.64±0.68bc 14.59±1.13e 235.83±9.82a 42.9±5.18c 53.13±1.69a
SMPE-MD DE 8-10 24 h 22.91±4.07ab 8.78±1.86ab 28.33±1.63ab 55.48±5.33b 65.49±7.35bc 3.61±0.54bc 14.10±0.54e 16.16±0.63d 34.65±1.54cd 23.29±1.33c
SMPE-MD DE 16.5-19.5 12 h 27.68±5.46a 5.77±0.06b 29.79±1.07ab 72.34±2.90a 95.91±3.96a 2.62±0.09c 392.86±9.90a 22.26±0.27d 34.18±1.30cd 30.81±2.66b
SMPE-MD DE 16.5-19.5 24 h 18.08±7.09abc 6.71±0.82b 32.26±1.14a 71.12±1.97a 85.43±1.85ab 7.77±0.15b 34.32±0.47d 106.74±10.73ab 58.52±2.96b 29.18±0.67b

EAI, emulsifying activity index; ESI, emulsifying stability index.

All values are expressed as the means of triplicate determinations±standard deviation (SD).

a–f Values followed by different letters within the same column are significantly different (p<0.05).

Download Excel Table
fep-29-2-119-g5
Fig. 5. Changes in the emulsifying properties of SMPE-MD conjugates according to pH, MD type, and dry-heating time. NS is not significantly different. All values are expressed as the means of triplicate determinations±standard deviation (SD). Different letters on different colored bars (blue, a-d; yellow, a’-d’; green, a”-b”) indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.05). MD×time, MD×pH, and Time×pH denote the two-way interactions among MD type, heating time, and pH, respectively, on the emulsifying properties (EAI and ESI) of SMPE conjugates. MD×time×pH represents the three-way interaction among these factors. In the three-way ANOVA, p<0.05 indicates a statistically significant effect for each factor or interaction.
Download Original Figure

The ESI values exhibited an inverse relationship with the EAI values across different pH levels, with a notably higher ESI observed at pH 4 (Fig. 5B). This could be attributed to the very low EAI at pH 4, likely resulting from a limited number of initially emulsified droplets. Consequently, although the turbidity ratio appeared lower at this pH, the absolute turbidity after 10 min was actually higher at elevated pH levels. Three-way ANOVA showed that all factors—pH, MD, and dry-heating time—significantly affected the ESI values (p<0.001). In particular, the conjugates prepared with smaller molecular weight MD (DE 16.5–19.5) showed significantly higher emulsifying stability than the control SMPE (p<0.001). Therefore, the results of this study indicate that the conjugated sample using MD with a lower molecular weight at pH 6 and dry-heating for 12 h was a favorable condition for improving the EAI and ESI of SMPE.

Conclusion

In this study, SMPE, a protein source extracted from food processing by-products, was used to investigate its structural and functional properties following conjugation with MD, thereby confirming its potential application in food systems. SMPE-MD conjugates were prepared via dry heat-induced glycosylation using MD with varying dextrose equivalents (DE 4–7, 8–10, and 16.5–19.5). Alterations observed in SDS-PAGE and FT-IR profiles confirmed that the conjugation of SMPE and MD occurred through the Maillard reaction. The solubility and emulsifying properties (EAI and ESI) of these conjugates were significantly influenced by both the DE of MD and the dry-heat treatment time. Solubility decreased with the increasing DE of MD but reached its peak after 12 h of dry-heating. In particular, SMPE-MD conjugates prepared with lower molecular weight MD (DE 16.5–19.5) showed significantly higher emulsifying stability compared to the control SMPE. These findings suggest that SMPE-MD conjugates have promising potential for functional food applications. Given their enhanced emulsifying stability, these conjugates may be particularly applicable in industrial formulations such as salad dressings, emulsified beverages, sauces, and plant-based dairy alternatives. However, the limited solubility of SMPE may hinder glycation efficiency by reducing the extent of molecular interaction and dispersion between protein and carbohydrate components. While this study employed prolonged stirring before freeze-drying to facilitate uniform hydration, future research should consider pretreatment strategies—such as pH adjustment, ultrasonication, high-pressure homogenization, or microwave processing—to enhance SMPE solubility and, consequently, bonding efficiency. These emerging technologies offer the potential to shorten reaction times, improve product uniformity, and reduce thermal damage during conjugation. Future studies focusing on the detailed optimization of processing conditions and further structural modifications may enhance the functionality of these conjugates and promote the value-added utilization of food processing by-products in various industrial formulations.

Conflict of interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, and Forestry (IPET) through High Value-added Food Technology Development Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (RS-2021-IP321023).

Data availability

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authorship contribution statement

Conceptualization: Rho SJ, Kim YR.

Data curation: Rho SJ, Kim YR.

Formal analysis: Kim DR, Rho SJ.

Methodology: Kim DR, Choi HS.

Software: Kim DR, Choi HS.

Validation: Kim YR.

Investigation: Kim DR, Rho SJ.

Writing - original draft: Rho SJ, Kim YR.

Writing - review & editing: Kim DR, Choi HS, Rho SJ, Kim YR.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

References

1.

Ali A, Kiani H, Labbafi M. 2019. A new functional protein-polysaccharide conjugate based on protein concentrate from sesame processing by-products: functional and physico-chemical properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 122: 659-666.

2.

Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72(1-2): 248-254.

3.

Chen W, Lv R, Wang W, Ma X, Muhammad AI, Guo M, Ye X, Liu D. 2019. Time effect on structural and functional properties of whey protein isolate-gum acacia conjugates prepared via Maillard reaction. J. Sci. Food Agric. 99(10): 4801-4807.

4.

De Oliveira FC, Coimbra JSDR, De Oliveira EB, Zuñiga ADG, Rojas EEG. 2016. Food protein-polysaccharide conjugates obtained via the Maillard reaction: a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 56(7): 1108-1125.

5.

Demirkıran E, Başyi?ğit B, Altun G, Yücetepe M, Sağlam H, Karaaslan M. 2022. Facile construction of fruit protein based natural hydrogel via intra/inter molecular cross-linking. Food Hydrocoll. 133: 107899.

6.

Du Q, Tang J, Xu M, Lyu F, Zhang J, Qiu Y, Liu J, Ding Y. 2021. Whey protein and maltodextrin-stabilized oil-in-water emulsions: effects of dextrose equivalent. Food Chem. 339: 128094.

7.

Higa FA, Nickerson MT. 2023. Plant protein-carbohydrate conjugates: a review of their production, functionality and nutritional attributes. Food Rev. Int. 39(2): 750-771.

8.

Hiller B, Lorenzen PC. 2010. Functional properties of milk proteins as affected by Maillard reaction induced oligomerisation. Food Res. Int. 43(4): 1155-1166.

9.

Huang GQ, Sun YT, Xiao JX, Yang J. 2012. Complex coacervation of soybean protein isolate and chitosan. Food Chem. 135(2): 534-539.

10.

Kato A, Sasaki Y, Furuta R, Kobayashi K. 1990. Functional protein-polysaccharide conjugate prepared by controlled dry-heating of ovalbumin-dextran mixtures. Agric. Biol. Chem. 54(1): 107-112.

11.

Kim DR, Jung Y, Rho SJ, Kim YR. 2023. Sonication of sesame meal protein isolates modified its microstructural and functional properties. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 186: 115242.

12.

Klompong V, Benjakul S, Kantachote D, Shahidi F. 2007. Antioxidative activity and functional properties of protein hydrolysate of yellow stripe trevally (Selaroides leptolepis) as influenced by the degree of hydrolysis and enzyme type. Food Chem. 102(4): 1317-1327.

13.

Kutzli I, Griener D, Gibis M, Schmid C, Dawid C, Baier SK, Hofmann T, Weiss J. 2020. Influence of Maillard reaction conditions on the formation and solubility of pea protein isolate-maltodextrin conjugates in electrospun fibers. Food Hydrocoll. 101: 105535.

14.

Laemmli UK, Beguin F, Gujer-Kellenberger G. 1970. A factor preventing the major head protein of bacteriophage T4 from random aggregation. J. Mol. Biol. 47(1): 69-85.

15.

Lee SK, Jang IS, Kim KM, Park SK, Lee WY, Youn KS, Bae DH. 2004. Changes in functional properties of rice bran and sesame meal proteins through chemical modifications. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 13(5): 555-560.

16.

Li Z, Zheng Y, Sun Q, Wang J, Zheng B, Guo Z. 2021. Structural characteristics and emulsifying properties of myofibrillar protein-dextran conjugates induced by ultrasound Maillard reaction. Ultrason. Sonochem. 72: 105458.

17.

Mir NA, Riar CS, Singh S. 2020. Structural modification in album (Chenopodium album) protein isolates due to controlled thermal modification and its relationship with protein digestibility and functionality. Food Hydrocoll. 103: 105708.

18.

Mulcahy EM, Mulvihill DM, O’Mahony JA. 2016. Physicochemical properties of whey protein conjugated with starch hydrolysis products of different dextrose equivalent values. Int. Dairy J. 53: 20-28.

19.

Naeini KK, Mousavi M, Kiani H, Labbafi M, Amiratashani F, Parandi E. 2024. Comprehensive study of Maillard induced structural modification of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) protein isolate: characterization, functional and antioxidant properties. J. Food Meas. Charact. 18(2): 1038-1052.

20.

Naik RR, Wang Y, Selomulya C. 2022. Improvements of plant protein functionalities by Maillard conjugation and Maillard reaction products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 62(25): 7036-7061.

21.

Nooshkam M, Madadlou A. 2016. Maillard conjugation of lactulose with potentially bioactive peptides. Food Chem. 192: 831-836.

22.

Onsaard E. 2012. Sesame proteins. Int. Food Res. J. 19(4): 1287-1295.

23.

Pirestani S, Nasirpour A, Keramat J, Desobry S, Jasniewski J. 2018. Structural properties of canola protein isolate-gum Arabic Maillard conjugate in an aqueous model system. Food Hydrocoll. 79: 228-234.

24.

Qu W, Zhang X, Han X, Wang Z, He R, Ma H. 2018. Structure and functional characteristics of rapeseed protein isolate-dextran conjugates. Food Hydrocoll. 82: 329-337.

25.

Ren Z, Chen Z, Zhang Y, Zhao T, Ye X, Gao X, Lin X, Li B. 2019. Functional properties and structural profiles of water-insoluble proteins from three types of tea residues. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 110: 324-331.

26.

Saatchi A, Kiani H, Labbafi M. 2019. A new functional protein-polysaccharide conjugate based on protein concentrate from sesame processing by-products: functional and physico-chemical properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 122: 659-666.

27.

Van Der Ven C, Muresan S, Gruppen H, De Bont DB, Merck KB, Voragen AG. 2002. FTIR spectra of whey and casein hydrolysates in relation to their functional properties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50(24): 6943-6950.

28.

Wang P, Xu L, Nikoo M, Ocen D, Wu F, Yang N, Jin Z, Xu X. 2014. Effect of frozen storage on the conformational, thermal and microscopic properties of gluten: comparative studies on gluten-, glutenin- and gliadin-rich fractions. Food Hydrocoll. 35: 238-246.

29.

Wang WQ, Bao YH, Chen Y. 2013. Characteristics and antioxidant activity of water-soluble Maillard reaction products from interactions in a whey protein isolate and sugars system. Food Chem. 139(1-4): 355-361.

30.

Zha F, Gao K, Rao J, Chen B. 2021. Maillard-driven chemistry to tune the functionality of pea protein: structure characterization, site-specificity, and aromatic profile. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 114: 658-671.

31.

Zhang B, Chi YJ, Li B. 2014. Effect of ultrasound treatment on the wet heating Maillard reaction between β-conglycinin and maltodextrin and on the emulsifying properties of conjugates. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 238: 129-138.

32.

Zhang Y, Niu F, Zhang X, Lu Z, Guo Y, Wang H. 2018. Controlled enzymatic hydrolysis on characteristic and antioxidant properties of soybean protein isolate-maltodextrin conjugates. Int. J. Food Prop. 21(1): 2239-2249.

33.

Zhou J, Li D., Zhang X, Liu C, Chen Y. 2023. Valorization of protein-rich waste and its application. Sci. Total Environ. 901: 166141.