Table 5. Sensory acceptability of Jinmal Dasik supplemented with citrus mandarin powder
| Citrus mandarin powder ratio (%) | Appearance | Flavor | Taste | Texture | Overall acceptability |
| 0 | 5.00±1.08a1) | 3.85±1.27a | 4.60±1.47a | 4.30±1.34a | 4.15±1.39a |
| 8 | 5.10±1.33ab | 4.20±1.40a | 4.70±1.53a | 4.30±1.38a | 4.35±1.42a |
| 16 | 5.85±1.50bc | 5.65±1.31b | 5.70±1.34b | 5.75±1.33b | 5.40±1.19b |
| 24 | 6.95±0.89d | 6.85±1.04c | 7.10±0.91c | 6.75±1.21c | 7.05±0.83c |
| 32 | 6.45±1.19cd | 6.95±1.32c | 5.05±0.94ab | 5.80±1.32b | 4.75±0.91ab |
| F (p) | 9.663 (<0.001)*** | 25.819 (<0.001)*** | 13.217 (<0.001)*** | 13.013 (<0.001)*** | 19.902 (<0.001)*** |
Each value represents Mean±SD (n=20).
Sensory acceptance score were evaluated using a 9-point hedonic scale (1=disliked extremely; 9=liked extremely) to assess the following sensory attributes. Values with different letters (a-d) within the same column differ significantly (p<0.05) based on one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test.
p<0.001.